Sunday, January 29, 2012

Gail Colletta

Boynton Beach man sentenced to nearly 10 years in prison for child porn


Now if ever there was a sitcom to prove my point about "sex offender advocates" this one reigns supreme. Seems Gail Colletta's son decided he was going to "lower the bar" in his sexual experimentations and decided "Kids and infants" might do the trick. Obviously Alex, her son "not being the brightest bulb in the box googled one too many times for his perverted thrills and found himself on Law Enforcements radar.
So fast forward and now we find Gail (who started her own little PAC committee) jumping on any and every proposed or existing legislation to do with Sex Offenders. To make matter worse she seems to be the offical spokesperson for newspaper writers looking for a quick quote to "fill" in dead space on their articles. Its a hell of a note when your claim to fame is for your son getting arrested for trolling to watch infants getting raped on the internet. I read quite a few of Gail's "quotes" and funny thing though, she never quite volunteers the details of why she is so adamant about abolishing and or diminishing sex offender laws and restrictions.. gotta laugh actually, maybe she thinks people won't put two and two together or memories will fade? Thats ok, I have Gails efforts on MY RADAR and I will be right there to remind all the good folks "why Gail" is determined to diminish sex offender laws. I assume it will be because ALEX is going to be an anchor around the families neck for life (after he gets out of prison, that is). So much for that vacation home Gail? I think women like Gail Colletta and society would be better served if she started saving for that rural trailer her son is gonna have to find due to the residency restrictions Florida has in place (for good reason by the way) rather than try and push guys like her son into my airspace when he finally does slither out of incarceration.
Gail Colletta uses terms in her blogs like "non-violent" and "victimless" . Umm Gail I wonder if the Parents of those infants that were being videoed think your son's conviction was "non-violent or "victimless"???
Gail Colletta like other so-called" SO advocates" is doing what they do best ..Trying to make a Mink coat out of a Rats back" and in the process? She is undermining mine, yours and your neighbors families safety, security and well being of our children . For no other reason than her kid stuck his hand in the fire and now she blames the fire for his getting burned.
I have no tolerance for Sex offenders, I have even less for wives, mothers, girlfriends who preach their kid or family member "just got a raw deal" and then have the balls to be a big mouth to try and change laws that were written with the blood of many victims only because "those same laws" entangled her clearly disturbed kid!

20 comments:

Valigator said...

Now ya gotta love this post by Gail..
" We all make mistakes, even people convicted of a sexual offense as not all of the offenses should be a felony. The AWA paints all offenders with the same brush and that is wrong on every level. There should be no mandatory minimum sentences and there should be a second chance for a first time offender, if there was a non-violent offense that did not involve contact of a minor and the offender is a low risk to re-offend"
We all make mistakes Gail? Oh really ???Nobody in my household ever made your son's kind of mistake! In fact no one in my extended family or friends have the claim to fame YOUR kid has!
Kinda curious Gail?? Dont think looking at 4 year olds getting raped counts as a felony?? No mandatory minimums?..what a joke..we lived too long with "judges descretion" that turned into a miscarriage of justice at best..I dont trust judges and I dont trust groups like yours that want to abolish mandatory minimums!
Second Chance?? This one always makes me giggle..second chance for who Gail? The guy who just happened to get "caught" the first time?? Which is it..Groups like the Second Chance "bullshit" club figure the first time a freak ends up in court is the first time they offended..(where do you get that kind of thinking by the way)? Oh and now "drum roll" my personal favorite, No contact crimes always a little humor in that one, Gail if your kid is getting off watching the insides of a 4 year old getting tore out or whether he is doing the tearing ""read my lips" its the same thing and the damage to the child is damage to the child..how people like you can split hairs and then have the guts to troll for money on the internet is disgusting at best..you wanna a War? I'll give you a War..

Valigator said...

http://www.dc.state.fl.us/ActiveInmates/detail.asp?Bookmark=1&From=list&SessionID=1068506410
Here is Gail's precious demon seed..looks a little cocky to me..hope Gail like Blountstown eateries..

oncefallendotcom said...

C'mon Val, are you going to stoop so low to start attacking friends of mine? You should understand the depths people go to for someone they love.

When you defended me from AZU, some would consider that hypocrisy. But now you're letting that old hate seep back in.

I don't blame Gail for fighting for her son. I'm fighting to ABOLISH THE REGISTRY and nothing less. Gail is my ally. I'm getting requests to add you to AZUnites. I damned sure don't want to fight you but I will do what I must.

I'd much rather you reconsider your approach and if we must disagree, we could at least do it respectfully.

Valigator said...

Gail Colletta wouldnt know you existed if it wasnt for her sons conviction and I would bet she would throw you under the bus in a heartbeat under any other circumstance..my point being is Gails son's crime was atrocious to its core..no excuses for the behavor, no accidents of a "he said, she said" ..why would you align yourself with her? Her son is the poster child for WHY the LAWS are written..I dont see the connection between you and him..maybe I am being naive..But I liken Gails mission as the same bullshit as offenders defending guys like (my) Dale Weeks for stalking me.. if your groups want sex crimes to be looked at individually and not grouped together, why do your groups align themselves with anything or anyone with SO status? I never got that..you honestly cant advocate for a guy who blitz rapes a 9 year old at a bus-stop along with a (he said she said) crime..so why do you all stick together?? I find that as mindboggling as you standing behind Alex or Gail Colletta..Alex is a Superfreak and every definition of a guy who is seriously fucked up..he got everything he deserved..

oncefallendotcom said...

No offense Val but if you were in my neighborhood and you were going around passing out fliers in my neighborhood I would have called you out on it. I don't think going around harassing people who have seed their sentences is a good idea. Your buddies like Judy Cornett have done more harm than good because y'all are creating bitterness. I fight back against those you align yourself with because they would kill me without hesitation.

Do you know how Christianity, once an obscure sect of Judaism, exploded into the world's largest religion? Persecution. Three hundred years of torture, edicts, executions, and so forth did nothing to stop Christianity from growing. Do you think persecution is going to change minds when every church in the world stands as an example why your campaign is doomed to fail?

You have listened to me enough to know damn good and well why I fight. Because many sex offender laws are unjust. I don't advocate abolishing AOC or rejecting punishment of offenses but the public registry is a sham, a tool for no one with vigi scum with too much time on her hands.

Why do you spend so much time hating on others? I know you have good in you, unlike AZU or Judy Cornett or NPFP. They are all wicked to the core and worse than those they hate. You know many of them are also involved in many other kinds of hate groups. You have it way too good, Valerie. Maybe that's why you seem to lack empathy these days. Its a shame, too.

So long as you fight my comrades, we'll always be adversaries, and I'll fight along side those you condemn. Florida is a state seriously in need of reform. Maybe I need to move there and kick some ass.

Valigator said...

Let me ask you something Derek? Why do you think I leaned from middle of the road and pragmatic to this position you now call "hateful"? I believe I published it a couple of times, but really why do think I went so far over to the right in my feelings on this issue?

Anonymous said...

Val you seriously need to educate yourself. Your being ridiculous. In some of the sex offender cases the punishmnt does not fit the crime and its unjust. Gail is not saying that laws should not be in place for these criminals but she is simply saying you need to be smart about it. So I honestly think you should rethink your outlook on all of this.

Valigator said...

Ok let me get this straight?

"Gail is not saying that laws should not be in place for these criminals but she is simply saying you need to be smart about it."

And when did Gail get her Law Degree? You obviously have not read any of my opinions on these crimes or the people who have committed them or the laws that pertain to these crimes.
You fail to understand I have Gail's webpage practically memorized at this point ..umm How smart is this mantra???

RSOL advocates ending draconian, unconstitutional laws and policies such as public registration, residency restrictions, civil commitment, criminalization of consensual sexual activities among minors, punitive treatment of those awaiting trial, and excessive punishments..hey your words sweetheart not mine:
Now lets dissect that mission statement shall we?

Valigator said...

Public registration is not Draconian: I remember when there was NO PUBLIC REGISTRATION one had to "request in writing the sex offenders in their zip code"by snail mail..now visualize my face when I opened up two weeks later a three page list of 64 offenders in a less than 30 block radius of my house. Valerie was NOT HAPPY. So you can "forget" going back to those days.
RESIDENCY RESTRICTIONS: In blue collar communities (not in Gail's neighborhood) the surplus of rental units is enormous. These same communities have new families, young families who can least afford a "hit" from one of these freaks and yet in one apartment building with twelve units I have 5 sex offenders living within feet of these young families? I dont think so..

Valigator said...

NO CIVIL COMMITTMENT?? Are you kidding me? How ass backwards can that statement even begin to be?
No you numb-nuts want anything that slithers released back out onto the community to wreak more havoc on families due to How do you put it? OH yea "they did their time"..I havent seen a sex offender yet who has "done their time" add overcrowding, good behavor, and gain time to the mix and it kinda throws that "inmates must serve 85% of their sentence down the toilet, dont ya think? Then what do you do with a guy like Gary Douglas Kerpan as only one example who is residing a few miles from me as I write this? Look him up, I am not going to play google for ya..No civil committment what a joke..latest stats have over 30,000 sex offenders in Florida alone who by every voodoo doctors criteria should be sitting in Arcadia, but where are they? Roaming my streets!

Valigator said...

umm what next? criminalization of consensual sexual activities among minors?? Where have you been? Florida hasnt prosecuted for that in years its called the "Romeo Legislation" if the two parties were within 4 years of each other and the operative word being "consentual" that statement on your mission page is moot. But you leave it there and you know why? So you can pass that bullshit off as the conviction all your precious offenders can use when the next door neighbor ask what "did he do"? The only aspect the "romeo" legislation that your so-called advocacy group doesnt even bother to promote is all offenders convicted under the Romeo Criteria should be removed from the registry NOW @ no cost to the registrant, but being the so-called voice of sex offenders, you people dont even mention it--dont even fight for it, and we both know why dont we? Because we both know once they are formally removed, you cant use that bullshit excuse anymore..So much for your Noble Reform mission, dont ya think?

Valigator said...

umm what next???
punitive treatment of those awaiting trial, and excessive punishments..now thats a mouthful dont ya think? Sweetie I have been to jail for "standing my ground" against societies version of Hannible Lector (oh sorry you guys like to call him a victim of mine) ya know the guy who was released 5 years early for kidnapping, torturing and chewing the genitals off his victim for 6 hours and the state dropped the ball by not putting him under any probation or supervision?? Surely you remember him, but I digress..honey jail is jail its not suppose to be fun and there are always terms and conditions when securing bail.If your gonna appeal to the "system" for fair and unbiased treatment then you obviously havent heard the term the "Inmates are running the asylum" ..I hate to break it to you but if you think we have bad guys running thru our streets? You ought to count the ones with badges that get Paid to oversee the criminals.. excessive punishments? The system "lives for that shit" and yet look at all your precious offenders who go out of their way to endure it over and over again, for one reason, they just cant seem to keep their zipper up..excessive punishments what a joke, when a guy in Florida can go down for CP and set up an internet connection the next day..or troll a library for use, My definition of punishment should be hot irons stuck in their eye sockets and you people bitch about an IP connection.

Valigator said...

"she is simply saying you need to be smart about it."

I really have to laugh at that one..Smart? When the "System" gets smart and figures out who to stick needles on whose arms rather than releasing them out to feed off our families over and over again, maybe my gray brain matter will spark a little quicker, when the System determines not to put a welcome wagon on the Florida/Georgia/Cuba/Haitian/ borders to every pervert that slithers across state lines or floats on shore my intelligence level may increase..when a state is so overloaded with sex offenders they actually have to designate them as "transient" because they dont want to keep them in their original state of conviction and Florida hands them a glass of ornage juice at the state line? Maybe my IQ will rise, but until then? Dont ever think I will let a Gail Colletta soften hard fought laws that were written with the blood of our kids. Let me ask you anonymous..has it ever occurred to any of you genius's that if you put a moritorium on sex offenders moving into this state, sending back offenders who violate their terms and conditions in THIS state to their original state of conviction, deport those who have sex crimes under their belts the moment they walk out of incarceration,send back Transients who have convictions from other states? that maybe just maybe Florida might not have to enforce such restrictive rules? Of course not..The Gail Colletta's of this world would rather absorb any offender who likes Florida's weather better and send them Christmas Cards.. for no other reason than her kid got caught up in this insidious mess..Gail Colletta is too selfish and too stupid to recognize most of Florida's homegrown offenders could be dealt with and managed more efficiently if we all just put our foot down and said to the state "NO MORE OFFENDERS" allowed, until then? Gail Colletta is my mortal enemy as long as she advocates shoving 10lbs of offenders in a one pound sack and trying to legislate them closer to my children!

Anonymous said...

i have to say i agree with your points val.that said, i am a rso! i was 17 when i slept with my 15 yo girlfriend. im not saying it was right but the romeo laws were not retroactive so if you were convicted before the law changed it still stands.i feel like you do in that i would make myself look bad alighning with pedos and rapists to try to show people im not that bad.i have a son and two daughters and would not hesitate to brutally murder anyone who harmed them. iv had therapist and po.s tell me that my crime is no better than the 50 year old man who rips apart his granddaughter i beg to differ but i digress. i do think the registry is too far reaching and that only fuels the nuts who think multiple child rapist should be left alone.i agree with reform i think statutory offenders streakers sexters ect should be removed so we can truely focus on the real threats.i have put away 2 pedos since iv been on the registry once i was working at a rent a center and reposessed a computer upon inspection i found the hard drive to be full of filth involving him and a small child i copied the contents and delivered them to my po who handled it from there .the second time was a guy from my therapy sessions i saw at his restaraunt job following young boys into the bathroom.i contacted his po who immesiatly violated him.my point is that not all sex offenders looking for reform want to excuse pedos and if i have to remain on it for something that happened 13 years ago to keep true pedos on there so be it

Valigator said...

My gut tells me that True Romeos need to be removed the registry "today" in all states. I have always been adamant about that. My gut tell me that there are "some" crimes that should have the registrant petition off the registry after walking the straight and narrow after say 10 years. I have always maintained that. What those "some crimes" are for smarter persons than myself to figure out. What I have zero tolerance for are offenders/their advocates who swear thats what their conviction was for when truth be told it was for something much more horrendous in the eyes of society. I have zero tolerance for "constitutional arguments" by freaks who have torn the insides out of child. They carry no weight with me and a defenseless child that used to "get off" has more rights than any guy who cant keep his sexual compulsions in check. I have zero tolernace for offenders/advocates who stand in a United front for no other reason than SO status. This aint my first Rodeo and for the loud mouths in RSOL who (do you no favors) by the way to try and go toe to toe with me is fruitless. True Romeos need to distance themselves from this motley crew as fast as possible, only then will they have the true support and backing from non registrants and the general public. But what would the majority RSOL members do then? They couldnt hide behind the Romeos anymore. As it stands you got guys (women) who have out and out done some horrendous crimes against our kids and will gain no traction by standing as one. I am the poster child for how devious RSOL members can be. I had the worst of the worst move into my neighborhood (every definition of what RSOL members swear should never have seen the light of day) and what does he become? A hero, A victim, A guy who should just be able to go on with his life, and the latest his "wife who was pregnant" have to laugh at that one..she was an illegal and they both had outstanding warrants. If anyone in this world knows how worthless and decieving and malicious one Uited group as RSOL members are? Its me.. When RSOL came after me after that episode, they might has well have stood over a stainless steel sink and cut their throats. I am not going to fight for your Romeo legislation anymore. Any of you who are worth your salt and have the balls to stand up against RSOL and distance yourselves as "true romeos" are gonna have to do it. RSOL will bite the hand that feeds them on every occation. Like I maintain, put a bounty on them..

Anonymous said...

i agree 100% . i maintain that i did wrong. and truth be told i got off easier than i could have given the law i was orig charged with statutory ( which i was guilty of) but pled to enticing. as youv said though there are too many true sickos out there hiding behind the few of us that are caught up in the overspray! as a registrant i can shed a little light to help. if someone claims to be a romeo there charges should be enticing a minor for indecent purposes, statutory rape, lewd and lacivious conduct,sexual assault on a person under 18,or sexual assault on a minor. child molestation is clearly defined as an act involving a child 12or under. aggravated child molestation involves 12 or under where the child is harmed ( ie insides ripped out as val puts it!)aggravated sexual assault it placing any thing other than your penis into vagina or anus of another either by force or on a child under 12 ( as a child is unable to consent)rape is defined as forced unwanted sex or any sex with anyone under 12 ( see above) sodomy is oral or anal sex and only one state still bans the act itself so if charged with it its either on a child or forced! aggravated sodomy is an act of sodomy that causes injury (anus ripped ect) or on a person under 12. if anyone tries to tell you they were a romeo or they were just flashing and their charges are what iv shown you THEY ARE LYING!!!!!! also look up the age vs conviction year... allow a few ( 1 to4 years for report arrest conviction ect if they are 40 and convicted 5 years ago it was not r&j! im so sick of seeing so. s whine about how their charge was consentual and wah wah wah then find out they ass raped their 5 yo son!!!! the problem is with these assholes is that true romeos are seldom believed due to the constant wolf cries we hear! reform will never happen and its the psycos at rsol we have to thank. they complain of how its wrong for everyone to be lumped together and yet advocate for romeos and pedos alike! i am a sex offender on the registry and i dont feel sorry for them! so how is anyone else going to?

Valigator said...

In Florida I have those charges memorized. I can dissect a conviction and a creative google search can pretty much lay out in spades what a guy went down for. In another post of mine on this site, I had specific examples of registrants doing well, walking the straight and narrow and not having rocks thrown out them everytime they opened their front door. The reason being? We keep that neighborhood cleaned up and the existing offenders dont have to compete with any miscreant that slithers out on early release. Neighborhoods will not absorb any freak who can afford the rent. We dont tolerate it. Wont tolerate it. Let me put it as blunt as possible. I know whose world to turn upside down and I know who to give the benefit of the doubt with one eye always watching. RSOL is a collective of anything that crawls or slithers. They are pure "sport" for me at this juncture. I still havent read one post on one RSOL site that is focusing on Romeo Legislation, but they sure have their hand out for anything else..

Valigator said...

Whats more pathetic? The women who go to the wall for these freaks. Regardless of conviction. I find that amazing. Its incredulous to me that these women will spend hours a day "advocating" for their convicts that decimated another families world. I will never wrap my head around that. I have alot higher expectations of the men in my world and who I expose my loved ones too. Not these women! They are "fixers" and lay their kids and relatives out on platters for these guys to feed off of. Some of the most vocal women in these RSOL groups have husbands,(prison) boyfriends and sons who "just made a mistake" ..when truth be told their crimes set humanities hair on fire. I find women (if thats what you want to call them) an embarrassment to the female species. Its been obvious to me for while bantering back and forth with these drama addicts that the only self esteem they can garner can come from a guy who lets his women fight for his name.

Valigator said...

If I was an offender whose partner defended my actions for molesting my own or her 6 year old daughter? I would kiss her ass too. But these women interpret it as "love" Are you kidding me? From reading their tales of woe out of their own mouths by the way one is left shaking their heads and validating why we have a constant crop of new victims everyday. The mothers are compelled to stand by their sons, but that doesnt mean they are gonna get by minimizing the crime to me, the wives are too dependant on the husbands and figures its easier to forgive than have to come up with bill money every month, (my personal favorite of late) we keep him away from "triggers" that may prompt him to re-offend?? WTF? Got that one from not so bright "Lisa Johnson" Triggers? almost fell off my chair, if my families safety is dependant on the Lisa Johnson's of this world to watch "triggers" in her lovers behavor, we are truly screwed! Triggers..as I told her my definition of a "trigger" is alot different than hers..and alot cheaper by the way..

Valigator said...

Seems Gail Colletta is up to her more devious endeavors by filing a Lawsuit against Seminole County, Florida Sheriff's office to abolish sex offender residency restrictions.

I thought it only prudent to inform every outlet I could that once these "restrictions" are lifted Seminole County will be the preferred nesting place for every deviant in the state. Along with any favorable ruling for FAC every bottom feeder in the country will be buying up vacant properties to set up a Sex offender Transitional housing facility that will de-value neighborhhood property values with the added risk of every Offender and Predator having unfettered access to any neighborhood in the county. The proverbial "Bucks for a Bed" is a nice little racket if want to get into it. Since the Collettas have some background in Property Management I am sure there is a "motive to their madness" with this lawsuit. Most of us realize that Gail has been working towards giving her deviant son a soft place to land once he gets out of Prison. Since I KNOW Gail doesn't have a philanthropic bone in her body, she will be able to kill a couple of birds with one stone if the suit is successful. Once I get done with Gail, she will probably be one of the most despised women in Florida, as well she should be.