Sunday, January 19, 2014
http://shanarowan.wordpress.com/
Wow!!!!! Shana has officially lost it. In one fell public swoop she exposed her fiance' victim's' name, address and decimated his mothers reputation, and insinuated Mafia ties to her mother-in laws husband's business.(ALL with NAMES) I wonder if they have seen this? I am sure someone will bring it to their attention..all I can say is OMG.. I wouldnt want to be Shana Rowan. Can anyone smell a civil suit?? Not so bright Shana..
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
She has every right to publicize their names. Don't quite your job to become a lawyer....you'd fail miserably. There's no libel at all. Now go crawl under a rock.
Its called the "Victim Bill of Rights" you might want to look it up. Another interesting read is the
"Crime Victims Rights Act".of 2004
and I repeat, "8) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim’s dignity and privacy.
Shana did everything to "out" the victim other than list her favorite color. For a Go-to Diva on all things sex offender, not very bright.
Confidentiality Is the Foundation of Healing
1) All information about the victim, stated or inferred, belongs to the victim.The victim owns the sole right to share this information and or any Identifying information.
2)Protection of Personal Information in Criminal Justice Records
Victims may have the right to protect the privacy of personal information, such as their name or identity, address, phone number, and place of employment contained in criminal justice documents, compensation records, and court testimony, as well as contact information provided for notification purposes. In some instances, the safety of the victim may be at stake if this personal information is made public. Some states extend this protection to witnesses or the "immediate family members" of the victim. Certain special victim populations, such as children, victims of sexual assault, domestic violence, stalking, or human trafficking, the elderly, and other vulnerable adults may have additional confidentiality rights that address their unique privacy concerns.
With the information Shana put out there, the world could find her fiance' victim's name, address, school and any other damn thing if they had a mind too. Shana Rowan was "stupid and spiteful" and has been wallowing in her own "victimhood" for so long she did exactly what I have been saying about these pathetic groups for years. They percieve No victim other than themselves. Have no respect for anyone other than themselves. Shana broke the cardinal rule..I hope she pays dearly for it.
It was a public trial, with public records; which means it's fair game. There is NOTHING anyone can do UNLESS Shana lied; at which point you'd have slander/libel. Sorry Gator, but you're wrong.....again.
wrong again grasshopper..the "victim" was 6 years old..special care is taken not to disclose a "child victim" ..no public trial list the victim's name even if the victim was an adult.
Gosh, you must feel really stupid being on the most vile list in the world and only re-enforced that stupidity to the world with your last couple of post..gotta laugh at you idiots.
She never mentions the victim's name, only the accusers who are both adults and would be on public record. But nice try in making her look like a bad guy. Even when I agree with what a person is saying, I find it hard to trust their word when it seems they are only out to demonize and bully people. Honestly, if you really want to be taken seriously, I would recommend lessons in true diplomacy which means not bullying others. Use your time and research you have and make a sensible case with it instead of wasting it to find every skeleton in the opposers closet.
Is that the word of the day Bullying? If you want to be taken seriously ask yourself this?
What if that was YOUR little girl? What if that was YOUR family? True diplomacy? You have been on the wrong side of the debate so long you wouldnt KNOW diplomacy if it hit you in the head. One must wonder, you seem to have such esteem and respect for this girl (Shana) why would you think someone as myself could "bully her" What? she makes herself a high profile advocate, she lands on any and everything that could perpetuate her to hero status among your groups and yet she is so fragile she can be bullied? One didnt have to look far, much less research her expose' Outing Her boyfriends "victim" Dont lecture me on diplomacy, I havent seen any semblance of "diplomacy" from your groups since their inception. If I may add something very relevant that your Groups have never quite grasped, "You are under some false impression that what I do concerning this issue is suppose to garner me some serious consideration afforded to me by YOUR groups"? I hate to be the one to break it to you, but YOUR approval or disapproval is of NO consequence to me. You would think after all these years some of you might have added that up? Lets quit bullshitting each other shall we? My day will not change one ioda whether Your members "take me seriously" or not. I dont exist for your members, I exist to offset the ongoing propaganda vomited by your groups on a daily basis in hopes the general public will not be swayed by your mantra of "we are all a bunch of great guys but got a raw deal" concept. Understood??
Oh and isnt it your groups "catch phrase" that the lack of privacy for offenders hinders them to become responsible and contributing members of society? But now its ok to list every identifying detail of a "victim" because Shana has a hard-on for the repercussions she willingly signed on for? Jesus Christ one does have wonder how low is low for your groups. You dont have to worry about someone as Myself being taken seriously, with that little expose' Shana in one fell swoop just decimated any serious consideration the public would ever have for groups like yours. Add on top of that, Derek Logue's rants, Robert Curtis's envitations, and the inadvertent outing of RSOL's origins being the original Nambla founder and my oh my, I doubt the word "serious" is in any dictionary your groups possess.
I wasn't saying this for you to be something I 'approve', but if you really want OTHERS to take you seriously, then being civil and diplomatic is a better way to go. The people I see who make the most change are not the ones seeming to find ways to make the other side look as horrible as possible, but use civil means to show their way is better.
What groups would that be? You don't even know who I am, what I stand for or how long I've been doing this. You just assume I'm all these things, but know nothing about it. I stand for truth and civility, neither of which did you show in this post. All I see on this blog is hate, hate and more hate.
I'll second the previous comment. She who lives by the sword shall also die by it. Judging from your blog and posts, you've damn near used up your nine lives....can you be civil? I tend to doubt it.
well Bless your little heart. I know my dilivery is quite harsh but If I may add a little peice of advice. In this world "civility" has a very high price when dealing with the "system" and those who advocate for that system with blatant lies and who play dirty. Add on top of that a "system" who I pay good money too by the way, that technically is suppose to diliver a service with the premise that those said systems have their ducks in a row?? If you bothered to read the description of this blog it makes no secret of my intentions here. But I digress, sweetie I dont have to write those cursory "please Mr. Senator" hear my "tale of woe" letters, I did that for a couple of years and read too many "Thank you for contacting our office and we appreciate your concerns" form letter. I have substancially fine tuned my approach and find my "harsh delivery" has gotten more attention than being nice. I am curious though, This is a horrendous and heinous plague on all kinds of victims and generations. Where is any reasonable persons mind would You presume to think we could have common ground by being nice? I am YOUR ENEMY and the more I know about you the less I like you. We will never send birthday cards to each other. I am not going to spend two hours on the phone trying to make you "feel better" about that convict you have chained around your neck, after violating your children and or family members. I dont wrap my head around that kind of violation and will never walk on the glass you people do. Your fooling yourselves to think you are capable of mending some of these men. But whats worse? Is your ready willing and able to throw my children under the bus if it makes your lives easier. I would say I am more on the right side of history than the the wrong one Knowing the system as I do.
Oh just for sport, you should google a couple of RSOL conferences. The one that comes to mind is with Gail Colletta,Eric Imhof, and Suzonne Kline on how to "approach your legislators"?? I wrote a post on it earlier. The next time you speak with her? Ask her how well that worked out for her so far this year?
""All I see on this blog is hate, hate and more hate."
Then you havent really read the blog now have you? You predetermine my feelings for you is hate. The opposite of Love is indifference. You are indifferent to me as I view some as collateral damage. My old adage is "when the system can determine whose arm to put a needle in (or stick in a cage forever) and who not too, then I will lean on the side of a more delicate caution. Until then? I must consider you all dangerous for no other reason than the High Victim Counts we have"
Post a Comment