Tuesday, November 26, 2013
would you ever date a sex offender ??
Now here is a forum that will leave you shaking your heads??
This is on "Families of Sex offenders" and there is an over-riding theme that came thru.
But here is the original question and read carefully "lets say you meet that special someone who you love very dearly with all your heart they give you butterflies and they are the sweetest thing you have ever meet and you parents love him and so do you friends but when that person says there a sex offender would you keep dating them or dump them once you found out about there history im saying someone because i know there are females who are sex offenders as well so i want answers from both male and female on what they think about dating a sex offender"
Umm You love dearly? How can you love someone dearly when they werent honest enough to tell you in the first five minutes they are a convicted FELON? This is how devious offenders are, they are introduced to friends, family (children)? Then they fess up they are offenders?(probably right before some legal entanglement is going to hit the new girlfriend in the face) Some women stated "other people informed them" of the status of the "New Love of their Lives" Reading MANY of the comments on this particular forum leaves one with the screaming desperation of some women. Offenders are manipulative and devious, of course they (offenders) are on their best behavor when searching for relationships with women who will run interference for them. Of course they are charming with anything that has a "job" and will (gladly) fill in the slack of those pesky offender fees. Jesus Christ these women see themselves as Martyr's and angels who are "fighting the good fight". But what is particularly disturbing is the comments the offenders themselves posted. "She lets me babysit her kids, Her friends have asked me to babysit" as if its some form of validation that they are harmless. When in reality, not one person have bothered to look at "court records for these guys". These broads are going on what was told to them by offenders, then pushing those same offenders into the worlds of their friends and families. YOU wonder why we have a new dose of Victims EVERDAY? Most of these women are to blame for that.
This is how stupid supporters of Child Porn offenders can be
For "sport" I occationally drift over to "families of Sex offenders" website to read what the weekly outrage and view the latest on their "precieved Persecution" is over.
I wasnt disappointed unfortunately.
The forum starts out: Bitching about the WAR on Child Porn:
(rewdiazeapm)says "Everyone in law enforcement has fallen in love with these fake "wars" and everyone benefits----except the curious young man or the older guy who is bored and has nothing to do but "explore" to see what all is on the Internet. The young men and the older, bored guy pays---and pays dearly.
UMM curious young man or bored guy?? Thats how these groups define Children being raped on the internet??
She goes on to write: It is too damn bad that our Department of Justice could not go after the Wall Street bankers and other financial corporations who helped create our economic problems with the same zeal that they use on our citizens for LOOKING---merely looking----at a naughty picture.
Merely Looking??
LegalGuardian says, "We have become a nation obsessed with demonizing sex, sexuality, and so forth even though such cannot and will not be snuffed out because the human brain, especially the male human brain, is wired for sex. It is a "war" that will never die so long as man desires sex. "legalGuardian has been wallowing in crap so long she obviously has no idea the odor permeating off her. Sounds to me she has embraced the concept that sex with kids is OK?
rewdiazepam chimes in with trying to equate the United States using drones with CP WTF? "In order to get all these laws passed and to help law enforcement (the "good" guys ha ha) stop child porn, they have to constantly remind the citizens that they are only protecting the children and the children's welfare is at stake here. At the same time they demonize anyone downloading child porn as a "predator" or "pedophile."
Yet the same country, the USA, that purports to love children so much has no qualms blowing the arms and legs off innocent children with a drone in Yemen or cutting off food stamps to low income families, which includes children. Or invading a country without provacation and causing the displacement of thousands of children." another broad who has layed in the gutter so long she cant smell herself!!
Sunday, November 17, 2013
http://once-fallen.blogspot.com/2013/11/once-fallen-set-to-shut-down-on-march.html
YEA ..over the last couple of years it became painfully obvious while this predator was "Hawking" for Donations for his pathetic website in one post he was inadvertently relaying that he was "subsidizing" his worthless efforts on another. I'll bet a hundred bucks Derek Logue's ego wont let him shut down his site..
Sunday, November 10, 2013
Oklahoma sex offender Ruling
http://www.ok.gov/doc/
http://oklahoma-criminal-defense.com/blog/2013/09/oklahoma-supreme-court-rules-on-retroactive-sex-offender-laws/
I am finding the info on this ruling "confusing". One article list the ruling as only encompassing offenders due to the date/ state of conviction and the registry not being applicable only due to those two criteria? Another article infers each offender will be reviewed with the caveat that the State needs to focus on the worst of the worst?? After reading bits and peices of the Starkey versus Oklahoma the court case centered around unlawful application of registery length being applied retroactively, not taking into consideration the "heinousness" of the crime??? So which is it? When Oklahoma instituted a "Teir level rating" his "Mr. Starkey's" threat level jumped to three. This ruling could have horrendous repercussions or it could be a good thing. I havent figured it out yet..
http://oklahoma-criminal-defense.com/blog/2013/09/oklahoma-supreme-court-rules-on-retroactive-sex-offender-laws/
I am finding the info on this ruling "confusing". One article list the ruling as only encompassing offenders due to the date/ state of conviction and the registry not being applicable only due to those two criteria? Another article infers each offender will be reviewed with the caveat that the State needs to focus on the worst of the worst?? After reading bits and peices of the Starkey versus Oklahoma the court case centered around unlawful application of registery length being applied retroactively, not taking into consideration the "heinousness" of the crime??? So which is it? When Oklahoma instituted a "Teir level rating" his "Mr. Starkey's" threat level jumped to three. This ruling could have horrendous repercussions or it could be a good thing. I havent figured it out yet..
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)