RSOL "Gail Colletta's how to bullshit Legislators Conference

RSOL’s Presentation for effective state advocacy and lobbying strategies "how to bullshit Legislators Conference Featured speakers Eric Imhof Suzonne Kline Gail Colletta Now this was interesting to say the least. This (how too) You Tube version of loosening the noose on sex offenders in your particular state, came across more like a sitcom of the old game show “What’s my Line”? Gail Colletta and her collection of EXPERTS sat on a panel and instructed the audience how to get Up Close and Personal with those who have the power to turn a sex offender’s world up side down. 1) Never use the term “Sex” Offender. Seems to be a mood killer. Use the term “Offender” and confuse them with drug dealers and gang bangers and when you think you have them (coming over to the dark side) in legislation verbiage quickly insert the term “sex offender” before they know what hit them.. 2) Don’t use the term “victim” it brings to mind blubbering beaten, assaulted and tearful persons which can be a “mood killer”. 3) Get in their Faces; make sure they acknowledge they know you. They may not remember where they know you from, “doesn’t matter” after a while they will think your old friends and they will introduce you to their colleagues whom will think your all on the same team.. 4) Recruit experts (even if they have been forced to resign from previous positions) that can razzle dazzle them with big words and confusing statistics. Approach the ATSA (voodoo doctors) who want to be taken seriously and have the need to garner more respect than they actually have in the mental health field. 5) Leave legislators with a “packet” of information that “glorifies” and highlights your position and include footnotes. Even if those “footnotes” include not so flattering statistics, chances are they won’t read them anyway. 6) Pretend to be on the same side initially to get an audience with them. Butter them up and congratulate them on their efforts to make their state safer, then throw them a curveball to cut cost by abolishing the registry and don’t mention the “cost” of diversion programs which ultimately will cost a bundle. 7) Tell them your there to educate them and again insert into conversation that offenders, (never sex offenders) are just nice guys and you want them fully informed by leaving them a Bar graph comparing them to shop lifters. 8) Never approach 1st year legislators, they aren’t savvy enough find their way around the Capitol Building much less due anything of substance for anyone. Why waste your time?? 9) Kiss up to legislators even if they are opposite of your party affiliation, tell them you VOTED for them. 10) Make sure you attend political gatherings and make a donation, soon you’ll figure out who can be bought and for how much.. 11) Never bring up the Adam Walsh Act, even though it’s proven to be positive for moderate risk offenders, RSOL needs to oppose every aspect of AWA. After all RSOL doesn’t want any oversight for offenders at all. 12) Even if the esteemed panel of Imhof, Kline and Colletta hate the Florida Governor and the entire Republicans smile and tell them you VOTED for them..

sexoffenderissues-valigator: Scorched Earth Policy for Sex offenders in Florida

sexoffenderissues-valigator: Scorched Earth Policy for Sex offenders in Florida

http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/12/17/3824398/senate-wants-to-toughen-laws-against.html

How many "Anonymous's" are out there?

The last couple of days I spent some time (observing) on blogs that dealt with the wives, mothers and children of incest survivors. The sheer turmoil and pain of these people can leave you on your knees asking how do they endure such betrayal? Each deal with it differently but at the end of the day its such an agonizing postion to be left in when a husband, son or significant other steps over the boundaries to rip apart the very fabric of the family unit. In between reading these post, "Anonymous" loves to send pithy comments of a deranged nature to this blog and I am left wondering, "what line did he cross"? What family unit did he desecrate? Its insighful to read from Offenders who "anonymously" reach into some inner percieved depths of hell and decide to lash out at us who have no tolerance for these crimes. I find it justifies my position on this issue when you KNOW "anonymous" is sitting behind a keyboard after having ripped any semblance of a normal life for those closest to him and the word "trust" is nothing but a word in the dictionary he betrays as soon as he opens his worthless eyes in the morning. It leaves me wondering, how many anonymous's are out there sneaking onto keyboards while their mothers, wives, sisters and fractured loved ones are going thru the grief trying to "buy back" the life they "thought" they had before they got hit in the face with the reality of a truly mentally deformed human being? From the amount of these survivors and their stories, it sounds like plenty and I know where at least one is "addicted to this blog".

would you ever date a sex offender ??

Now here is a forum that will leave you shaking your heads?? This is on "Families of Sex offenders" and there is an over-riding theme that came thru. But here is the original question and read carefully "lets say you meet that special someone who you love very dearly with all your heart they give you butterflies and they are the sweetest thing you have ever meet and you parents love him and so do you friends but when that person says there a sex offender would you keep dating them or dump them once you found out about there history im saying someone because i know there are females who are sex offenders as well so i want answers from both male and female on what they think about dating a sex offender" Umm You love dearly? How can you love someone dearly when they werent honest enough to tell you in the first five minutes they are a convicted FELON? This is how devious offenders are, they are introduced to friends, family (children)? Then they fess up they are offenders?(probably right before some legal entanglement is going to hit the new girlfriend in the face) Some women stated "other people informed them" of the status of the "New Love of their Lives" Reading MANY of the comments on this particular forum leaves one with the screaming desperation of some women. Offenders are manipulative and devious, of course they (offenders) are on their best behavor when searching for relationships with women who will run interference for them. Of course they are charming with anything that has a "job" and will (gladly) fill in the slack of those pesky offender fees. Jesus Christ these women see themselves as Martyr's and angels who are "fighting the good fight". But what is particularly disturbing is the comments the offenders themselves posted. "She lets me babysit her kids, Her friends have asked me to babysit" as if its some form of validation that they are harmless. When in reality, not one person have bothered to look at "court records for these guys". These broads are going on what was told to them by offenders, then pushing those same offenders into the worlds of their friends and families. YOU wonder why we have a new dose of Victims EVERDAY? Most of these women are to blame for that.

This is how stupid supporters of Child Porn offenders can be

For "sport" I occationally drift over to "families of Sex offenders" website to read what the weekly outrage and view the latest on their "precieved Persecution" is over. I wasnt disappointed unfortunately. The forum starts out: Bitching about the WAR on Child Porn: (rewdiazeapm)says "Everyone in law enforcement has fallen in love with these fake "wars" and everyone benefits----except the curious young man or the older guy who is bored and has nothing to do but "explore" to see what all is on the Internet. The young men and the older, bored guy pays---and pays dearly. UMM curious young man or bored guy?? Thats how these groups define Children being raped on the internet?? She goes on to write: It is too damn bad that our Department of Justice could not go after the Wall Street bankers and other financial corporations who helped create our economic problems with the same zeal that they use on our citizens for LOOKING---merely looking----at a naughty picture. Merely Looking?? LegalGuardian says, "We have become a nation obsessed with demonizing sex, sexuality, and so forth even though such cannot and will not be snuffed out because the human brain, especially the male human brain, is wired for sex. It is a "war" that will never die so long as man desires sex. "legalGuardian has been wallowing in crap so long she obviously has no idea the odor permeating off her. Sounds to me she has embraced the concept that sex with kids is OK? rewdiazepam chimes in with trying to equate the United States using drones with CP WTF? "In order to get all these laws passed and to help law enforcement (the "good" guys ha ha) stop child porn, they have to constantly remind the citizens that they are only protecting the children and the children's welfare is at stake here. At the same time they demonize anyone downloading child porn as a "predator" or "pedophile." Yet the same country, the USA, that purports to love children so much has no qualms blowing the arms and legs off innocent children with a drone in Yemen or cutting off food stamps to low income families, which includes children. Or invading a country without provacation and causing the displacement of thousands of children." another broad who has layed in the gutter so long she cant smell herself!!

http://once-fallen.blogspot.com/2013/11/once-fallen-set-to-shut-down-on-march.html

YEA ..over the last couple of years it became painfully obvious while this predator was "Hawking" for Donations for his pathetic website in one post he was inadvertently relaying that he was "subsidizing" his worthless efforts on another. I'll bet a hundred bucks Derek Logue's ego wont let him shut down his site..

Oklahoma sex offender Ruling

http://www.ok.gov/doc/

http://oklahoma-criminal-defense.com/blog/2013/09/oklahoma-supreme-court-rules-on-retroactive-sex-offender-laws/
I am finding the info on this ruling "confusing". One article list the ruling as only encompassing offenders due to the date/ state of conviction and the registry not being applicable only due to those two criteria? Another article infers each offender will be reviewed with the caveat that the State needs to focus on the worst of the worst?? After reading bits and peices of the Starkey versus Oklahoma the court case centered around unlawful application of registery length  being applied retroactively, not taking into consideration the "heinousness" of the crime??? So which is it? When Oklahoma instituted a "Teir level rating" his "Mr. Starkey's" threat level jumped to three. This ruling could have horrendous repercussions or it could be a good thing. I havent figured it out yet..